colleges and university

Should students be able to use their own laptops for note-taking in their classes? Or should laptops altogether be banned from classrooms? These questions describe an ongoing battle between students and teachers in recent years. Nowadays it is not unusual to find one or more of these machines in the average American household. As the technology for laptops and computers become more advanced these machines are becoming much more affordable for the general public than ever before. Many people especially students incorporate the use of computers into their lives to help them accomplish and manage daily tasks in efficient and convenient ways. As a senior in college. I know that laptops are truly powerful tools that literally put a world of information at your fingertips. As an English and Communications student. I am nearly always using my laptop to draft my writings research keep up-to-date on daily news use it as a source of reference and manage all of my files. However one of the greatest benefits of having a laptop is the ability to take notes efficiently in class. This method eliminates the disorder and cumbersome edits that are inherent in taking notes with pen-and-paper. Understandably many professors believe that laptops should be banned from classrooms because they become a source of distraction and degrade the learning environment. Truth be told that is only true on a case-to-case basis; students who flagrantly violate the class should be dealt with personally by the professor. Responsible students who value their education should not be punished in ways that debilitate their learning. We live in an era of technology and information. Since that is the case many students have taken advantage of the benefits that laptops offer. Taking a step backwards would be unnatural. College and university students should not be banned from using their laptops in classrooms not only because students are financially and morally responsible for their own education but also because the benefits of using laptops are too great to ignore. While the educational institution as a whole should not be able to ban laptops professors should retain the right to stop students’ inappropriate behaviors that egregiously disrupt the entire class. For example when cell phones first became widely available it was not unusual for the blaring music of ringtones to interrupt class. As a result colleges did not ban cell phones from classrooms. Instead professors now implement their own rules and preferences about cell phone use and explain them to their students early in the semester or quarter. They can also include their rules and preferences perhaps even penalties on the syllabus. Similarly if a student is obviously disrupting the classroom and not participating at all then he or she could be asked to leave. As adults college students should demonstrate common courtesy in educational environments and be mindful of others who are willing to learn. Despite rising costs in tuition and cuts in educational funding students who pursue a higher education are responsible for paying for the costs. It is therefore within their rights to pursue their education in any way that is beneficial. One of the ways students look to enhance their learning is to invest their money in purchasing a laptop. Nowadays people can purchase a decent laptop at an average price of $600. Such a laptop typically comes with large memory to store files and documents and has good processing power to allow the user to manage many windows without lag. In addition to purchasing the laptop students must also buy all of the correct software which is usually very expensive. Though the investment is costly it is undoubtedly well worth the money for those who find note-taking on laptops beneficial because it helps students get more out of their classes. In my experiences in numerous lectures and discussions my laptop provides many advantages. When I use a pen and paper to take notes. I tend to do a lot of erasing and rewriting to organize my notes since lectures are not always organized themselves. After class. I usually go home and retype my notes on my laptop to consolidate the ideas in a coherent manner. In the process. I could also add notes that I have taken from my readings which makes for better studying materials when exams are around the corner. Reorganizing and filing paperwork wastes valuable time that could well be spent on studying or completing an assignment. Like many people. I type faster than I write. Once I started typing my notes in class they became more detailed and organized. Editing can be done with ease since changes can be made along as the teacher lectures. By having more coherent notes. I can focus on discussions more because I am not worrying over whether I have written down the important points. I am not the kind of person who can remember everything easily so the ability to take good notes in lectures is extremely advantageous especially when professors provide extra information that is beyond the textbooks. To be prohibited from using a laptop for note-taking in class would be a severe handicap placed on those who actually benefit from using one. Nowadays one of the advantages of having a laptop is to eliminate the need to carry around several bulky textbooks. Students have the option to purchase electronic textbooks downloadable versions of a required text for many classes. Often times these versions of the books are significantly cheaper than their paper counterparts. Class texts can be stored on laptops which makes for greater convenience. These reasons alone make it a necessity for some students to use their laptops in class particularly if the student is disabled. Disabled students can be freed from juggling several textbooks between classes. It makes no sense for schools to promote the use of laptops by offering electronic textbooks in addition to wireless internet and then forbid students from referring to them in class. By typing out lectures notes students can save money on schools supplies as well as space. Since I have begun to use my laptop in class. I have not had to purchase as many pencils pens and notebooks among other supplies than I did before. Such supplies can be very costly for a college student. Also. I tend to save all my schoolwork and notes for every class throughout each semester; this collection becomes my personal library. As an English student it is important that I am able to refer back to older work incase I need to refresh on a particular subject. As you can imagine my school binder gets very bulky towards the middle of the semester. However by having digital versions of my notes and school work. I can save a lot of wasted paper. Also. I have more space at home that would have been devoted to storing school papers and textbooks; my home study room is not crowded with papers and junk. Instead it is a comfortable place to read study and think. In the larger scheme of things allowing students to use laptops can also help save the school a lot of waste and money. Many schools now implement the use of Blackboard an application that allows professors to directly communicate with students from all of their classes and store class documents for student access. Having digital versions of class materials can save a lot of paper because professors would not always need to print out countless handouts and/or overheads. They can also avoid trashing a multitude of extra paperwork. Naturally schools would save money on fixing and replacing office equipment like photo-copiers and printers ink and also take advantage of the opportunity to save waste and recycle. Let us be honest. Schools function like businesses: when schools do not get enough funding many classes are cut from the curriculum and classrooms become more crowded. Those things degrade the variety and quality of education. Therefore it is a great benefit for schools to save money where it can. In a time when funds are slashed from educational institutions and when pollution and global warming are hot issues schools can not only be more environmentally friendly this way but also save money and spend it in ways that would continue to enhance education. Despite the fact that laptops benefit students professors schools as well as the learning process itself many professors are worried about the problems that these machines can bring. It is important to address their concerns because professors who subscribe to the following notions are misguided to blame laptops for the cause of such problems. As the saying goes knowledge is a light unto the world. Neglecting to explore the roots of those problems is harmful because it denies people the chance for improvement. In times when light is needed snuffing out a flame before it has a chance to shine through darkness is a foolish thing to do. The notion that laptop-note-taking students become mindless stenographers is a faulty one. Professors who subscribe to this idea believe that students focus on transcribing their lectures word for word and suspend their ability to think critically and analyze. These ideas are believed to degrade the quality of discussions. It is important to realize that this issue is not merely a matter of what medium is used to take notes. Students who transcribe a professor’s lecture on a laptop may just as well do that if he or she is writing with a pen. Clearly this matter focuses on the methods people implement to think and learn-those who transcribe lectures may indicate that they lack an effective way of learning and analyzing the subject matter. Like the pen-and-paper laptops are just tools for people to use to their own advantages. That is why math students generally do not use laptops for class because it is ineffective in that setting (frankly if he did the rest of us would look at him funny). Instead of banning laptops students need to learn effective note-taking and critical thinking methods in order to take meaningful notes. The notion that banning laptops will produce more eye contact and good quality discussions is also false. Professor Nomi Stolzenberg teaches law classes to first-year students at the University of Southern California and has also prohibited laptops from being used in class. According to the Daily Trojan. Stolzenberg stated that when she “implemented this policy it was amazing because after years of teaching suddenly everyone’s faces are upturned when usually [she is] gazing out at people who are staring at their screens.” Constant lively class discussions will not suddenly become the norm when laptops are banned from classes. Realistically speaking there will always be students who will gaze at their screens just as there are students who gaze out the window or on their desks. There will also be students who are distracted by the person beside them who cannot stop tapping his feet or the birds outside that will not stop tweeting or that sexy guy or girl sitting on the other side of class or they cannot pull their attention away from the bright little orange pulp that seems to be glued to Mr. Garza’s mustache. The list goes on. In all my years of schooling classes generally have several dominant speakers who are usually contributing while there are many more who are generally quiet. Considering the variety of personalities found in schools it is unreasonable and ridiculous to assume that laptops are the sole reason for less-than-astounding discussions. Banning laptops will not automatically mean that all students will suddenly sit through class with “upturned faces” and participation rates will hike. The relationship between students and teachers can impact the learning atmosphere in classes. Some teachers are able to really engage students into the subject matter and create an environment for open meaningful and sometimes fun discussions. In my experiences. I have discovered that when professors show that they genuinely want to help people succeed a relationship of reciprocal growth and participation tends to take place. Granted not all subject matters are fun and exciting to learn. I do not imagine many people cart-wheeling for joy and clouds parting for the choir to sing when it comes to tax laws. However students investing in their futures should have the fortitude and motivation to learn in class no matter how dry some subjects can be. If they have the correct attitude then they will naturally make eye-contact engage in discussions think critically about the class and at the very least deal with distractions accordingly. People who support students to only write their notes must remember several things. First of all students who are writing are not necessarily taking notes. These students may just as well be doodling writing for their own interests or even doing homework for other classes. Similarly students using laptops may be watching videos and shopping online instead of participating and taking notes. In all of these cases professors must exercise reasonable judgment to decide how to deal with students who are clearly disrupting the class. Such students may be asked to stop doing homework for another class stop viewing e-bay or may be asked to leave if the violation is severe enough. Secondly people should also keep in mind that some disabled students do not have the ability to write notes. They may require a machine or employ another person to help them through class. In California State University. Fullerton professors are required to let students know about Disabled Student Services. According to its website the institution provides “notetaker services,” “manual manipulation for classroom and related academic activities,” “adaptive educational equipment and technology,” and “interpreter services” that include “manual steno and oral interpreting for hearing-impaired students.” Clearly some students require the use of machines computers and even people in order to take effective notes and learn. Finally people who are for the ban on laptops should remember that students have different learning styles. Unlike the past it is public knowledge that learning disabilities exist. Not everyone thinks in a linear manner. People who have Attention Deficit Disorder have a certain way of paying attention and learning things. Also people who have various degrees of autism pay attention to things in different ways. In both cases these people may have to perform a certain action so that they can focus on a particular thought. This does not however mean they are lesser in any way to “normal” people; it means that all people function in different ways. In the case of a disabled student who requires another person to take notes for them professors do not complain that the notetaker may transcribe the lecture or that disabled students are not learning enough because someone else is taking notes for them. Bearing these things in mind people particularly professors should understand that students have various ways of thinking and paying attention in class. For example if a student doodles in class perhaps it is a way of keeping his or her mind anchored on one thing so that he or she can focus on the professor’s lecture. Students who learn and remember things by writing will tend to write out notes. Students who have the ability to remember things by listening may not take down as many notes. By understanding that people learn and think in various ways professors can help their students to better succeed. College and university students should have the right to use their laptops for note-taking in class because they are responsible for their education; in doing so students professors and schools can gain many benefits. As the cost of living and pursuing an education becomes more expensive investments in one’s future must be made wisely. In an age when technology and information are highly valued many students have invested large amounts of money into purchasing a laptop. The assumption made when purchasing the computer is that they would be able to use its capability and purpose fully. Although banning students from using laptops in class appears to be a minor issue it is not: when professors and schools ban students from typing out their notes in class they handicap the learning process for those who find laptops advantageous. Although there are still many students who do not bring their laptops to class many do own one and use it at home. Clearly laptops and computers have become a staple for students and the educational field as a whole. The solution to ban laptops from being used in class is no solution at all. Simply blaming laptops as the cause for problems that have existed long before laptops became popular is not a mature or effective way to improve education; those who do so are not considering the real problems. Schools that support that ban will effectively have severed a great opportunity for improving education and therefore adversely affect a large part of future generations. As we live in a globalized world our lives are now affected by others living on the opposite ends of the Earth. Other countries either have or are building strong educational foundations for their people. Now is not the time to take steps backward. As a college student dedicated to my education and my future. I believe that those who have control over how I can and cannot pursue my education should examine this issue more fairly and not be so swift to turn a blind eye to the advantages that laptops offer. As with all changes that develop in life the ability to make good changes come out of opportunities is never done by denying people those opportunities. That is a great very detailed summary of allowing laptops in the classroom. I agree with what you’ve said and I believe that professors should always allow laptops into the classroom and that given time the laptop will evolve into the same comfort zone in the classroom that the cell phone has. Do you use any specific software for you note taking in the classroom? I work for a company that is marketing and we are curious to learn more about students that do use in the classroom so we can help to implement what students need and want to improve the note-taking process. Please feel free to contact me if you’d be interested in giving us information on your note-taking experience.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://nshadowsong.wordpress.com/2008/06/09/laptops-an-educational-essential/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Should students be able to use their own laptops for note-taking in their classes? Or should laptops altogether be banned from classrooms? These questions describe an ongoing battle between students and teachers in recent years. Nowadays it is not unusual to find one or more of these machines in the average American household. As the technology for laptops and computers become more advanced these machines are becoming much more affordable for the general public than ever before. Many people especially students incorporate the use of computers into their lives to help them accomplish and manage daily tasks in efficient and convenient ways. As a senior in college. I know that laptops are truly powerful tools that literally put a world of information at your fingertips. As an English and Communications student. I am nearly always using my laptop to draft my writings research keep up-to-date on daily news use it as a source of reference and manage all of my files. However one of the greatest benefits of having a laptop is the ability to take notes efficiently in class. This method eliminates the disorder and cumbersome edits that are inherent in taking notes with pen-and-paper. Understandably many professors believe that laptops should be banned from classrooms because they become a source of distraction and degrade the learning environment. Truth be told that is only true on a case-to-case basis; students who flagrantly violate the class should be dealt with personally by the professor. Responsible students who value their education should not be punished in ways that debilitate their learning. We live in an era of technology and information. Since that is the case many students have taken advantage of the benefits that laptops offer. Taking a step backwards would be unnatural. College and university students should not be banned from using their laptops in classrooms not only because students are financially and morally responsible for their own education but also because the benefits of using laptops are too great to ignore. While the educational institution as a whole should not be able to ban laptops professors should retain the right to stop students’ inappropriate behaviors that egregiously disrupt the entire class. For example when cell phones first became widely available it was not unusual for the blaring music of ringtones to interrupt class. As a result colleges did not ban cell phones from classrooms. Instead professors now implement their own rules and preferences about cell phone use and explain them to their students early in the semester or quarter. They can also include their rules and preferences perhaps even penalties on the syllabus. Similarly if a student is obviously disrupting the classroom and not participating at all then he or she could be asked to leave. As adults college students should demonstrate common courtesy in educational environments and be mindful of others who are willing to learn. Despite rising costs in tuition and cuts in educational funding students who pursue a higher education are responsible for paying for the costs. It is therefore within their rights to pursue their education in any way that is beneficial. One of the ways students look to enhance their learning is to invest their money in purchasing a laptop. Nowadays people can purchase a decent laptop at an average price of $600. Such a laptop typically comes with large memory to store files and documents and has good processing power to allow the user to manage many windows without lag. In addition to purchasing the laptop students must also buy all of the correct software which is usually very expensive. Though the investment is costly it is undoubtedly well worth the money for those who find note-taking on laptops beneficial because it helps students get more out of their classes. In my experiences in numerous lectures and discussions my laptop provides many advantages. When I use a pen and paper to take notes. I tend to do a lot of erasing and rewriting to organize my notes since lectures are not always organized themselves. After class. I usually go home and retype my notes on my laptop to consolidate the ideas in a coherent manner. In the process. I could also add notes that I have taken from my readings which makes for better studying materials when exams are around the corner. Reorganizing and filing paperwork wastes valuable time that could well be spent on studying or completing an assignment. Like many people. I type faster than I write. Once I started typing my notes in class they became more detailed and organized. Editing can be done with ease since changes can be made along as the teacher lectures. By having more coherent notes. I can focus on discussions more because I am not worrying over whether I have written down the important points. I am not the kind of person who can remember everything easily so the ability to take good notes in lectures is extremely advantageous especially when professors provide extra information that is beyond the textbooks. To be prohibited from using a laptop for note-taking in class would be a severe handicap placed on those who actually benefit from using one. Nowadays one of the advantages of having a laptop is to eliminate the need to carry around several bulky textbooks. Students have the option to purchase electronic textbooks downloadable versions of a required text for many classes. Often times these versions of the books are significantly cheaper than their paper counterparts. Class texts can be stored on laptops which makes for greater convenience. These reasons alone make it a necessity for some students to use their laptops in class particularly if the student is disabled. Disabled students can be freed from juggling several textbooks between classes. It makes no sense for schools to promote the use of laptops by offering electronic textbooks in addition to wireless internet and then forbid students from referring to them in class. By typing out lectures notes students can save money on schools supplies as well as space. Since I have begun to use my laptop in class. I have not had to purchase as many pencils pens and notebooks among other supplies than I did before. Such supplies can be very costly for a college student. Also. I tend to save all my schoolwork and notes for every class throughout each semester; this collection becomes my personal library. As an English student it is important that I am able to refer back to older work incase I need to refresh on a particular subject. As you can imagine my school binder gets very bulky towards the middle of the semester. However by having digital versions of my notes and school work. I can save a lot of wasted paper. Also. I have more space at home that would have been devoted to storing school papers and textbooks; my home study room is not crowded with papers and junk. Instead it is a comfortable place to read study and think. In the larger scheme of things allowing students to use laptops can also help save the school a lot of waste and money. Many schools now implement the use of Blackboard an application that allows professors to directly communicate with students from all of their classes and store class documents for student access. Having digital versions of class materials can save a lot of paper because professors would not always need to print out countless handouts and/or overheads. They can also avoid trashing a multitude of extra paperwork. Naturally schools would save money on fixing and replacing office equipment like photo-copiers and printers ink and also take advantage of the opportunity to save waste and recycle. Let us be honest. Schools function like businesses: when schools do not get enough funding many classes are cut from the curriculum and classrooms become more crowded. Those things degrade the variety and quality of education. Therefore it is a great benefit for schools to save money where it can. In a time when funds are slashed from educational institutions and when pollution and global warming are hot issues schools can not only be more environmentally friendly this way but also save money and spend it in ways that would continue to enhance education. Despite the fact that laptops benefit students professors schools as well as the learning process itself many professors are worried about the problems that these machines can bring. It is important to address their concerns because professors who subscribe to the following notions are misguided to blame laptops for the cause of such problems. As the saying goes knowledge is a light unto the world. Neglecting to explore the roots of those problems is harmful because it denies people the chance for improvement. In times when light is needed snuffing out a flame before it has a chance to shine through darkness is a foolish thing to do. The notion that laptop-note-taking students become mindless stenographers is a faulty one. Professors who subscribe to this idea believe that students focus on transcribing their lectures word for word and suspend their ability to think critically and analyze. These ideas are believed to degrade the quality of discussions. It is important to realize that this issue is not merely a matter of what medium is used to take notes. Students who transcribe a professor’s lecture on a laptop may just as well do that if he or she is writing with a pen. Clearly this matter focuses on the methods people implement to think and learn-those who transcribe lectures may indicate that they lack an effective way of learning and analyzing the subject matter. Like the pen-and-paper laptops are just tools for people to use to their own advantages. That is why math students generally do not use laptops for class because it is ineffective in that setting (frankly if he did the rest of us would look at him funny). Instead of banning laptops students need to learn effective note-taking and critical thinking methods in order to take meaningful notes. The notion that banning laptops will produce more eye contact and good quality discussions is also false. Professor Nomi Stolzenberg teaches law classes to first-year students at the University of Southern California and has also prohibited laptops from being used in class. According to the Daily Trojan. Stolzenberg stated that when she “implemented this policy it was amazing because after years of teaching suddenly everyone’s faces are upturned when usually [she is] gazing out at people who are staring at their screens.” Constant lively class discussions will not suddenly become the norm when laptops are banned from classes. Realistically speaking there will always be students who will gaze at their screens just as there are students who gaze out the window or on their desks. There will also be students who are distracted by the person beside them who cannot stop tapping his feet or the birds outside that will not stop tweeting or that sexy guy or girl sitting on the other side of class or they cannot pull their attention away from the bright little orange pulp that seems to be glued to Mr. Garza’s mustache. The list goes on. In all my years of schooling classes generally have several dominant speakers who are usually contributing while there are many more who are generally quiet. Considering the variety of personalities found in schools it is unreasonable and ridiculous to assume that laptops are the sole reason for less-than-astounding discussions. Banning laptops will not automatically mean that all students will suddenly sit through class with “upturned faces” and participation rates will hike. The relationship between students and teachers can impact the learning atmosphere in classes. Some teachers are able to really engage students into the subject matter and create an environment for open meaningful and sometimes fun discussions. In my experiences. I have discovered that when professors show that they genuinely want to help people succeed a relationship of reciprocal growth and participation tends to take place. Granted not all subject matters are fun and exciting to learn. I do not imagine many people cart-wheeling for joy and clouds parting for the choir to sing when it comes to tax laws. However students investing in their futures should have the fortitude and motivation to learn in class no matter how dry some subjects can be. If they have the correct attitude then they will naturally make eye-contact engage in discussions think critically about the class and at the very least deal with distractions accordingly. People who support students to only write their notes must remember several things. First of all students who are writing are not necessarily taking notes. These students may just as well be doodling writing for their own interests or even doing homework for other classes. Similarly students using laptops may be watching videos and shopping online instead of participating and taking notes. In all of these cases professors must exercise reasonable judgment to decide how to deal with students who are clearly disrupting the class. Such students may be asked to stop doing homework for another class stop viewing e-bay or may be asked to leave if the violation is severe enough. Secondly people should also keep in mind that some disabled students do not have the ability to write notes. They may require a machine or employ another person to help them through class. In California State University. Fullerton professors are required to let students know about Disabled Student Services. According to its website the institution provides “notetaker services,” “manual manipulation for classroom and related academic activities,” “adaptive educational equipment and technology,” and “interpreter services” that include “manual steno and oral interpreting for hearing-impaired students.” Clearly some students require the use of machines computers and even people in order to take effective notes and learn. Finally people who are for the ban on laptops should remember that students have different learning styles. Unlike the past it is public knowledge that learning disabilities exist. Not everyone thinks in a linear manner. People who have Attention Deficit Disorder have a certain way of paying attention and learning things. Also people who have various degrees of autism pay attention to things in different ways. In both cases these people may have to perform a certain action so that they can focus on a particular thought. This does not however mean they are lesser in any way to “normal” people; it means that all people function in different ways. In the case of a disabled student who requires another person to take notes for them professors do not complain that the notetaker may transcribe the lecture or that disabled students are not learning enough because someone else is taking notes for them. Bearing these things in mind people particularly professors should understand that students have various ways of thinking and paying attention in class. For example if a student doodles in class perhaps it is a way of keeping his or her mind anchored on one thing so that he or she can focus on the professor’s lecture. Students who learn and remember things by writing will tend to write out notes. Students who have the ability to remember things by listening may not take down as many notes. By understanding that people learn and think in various ways professors can help their students to better succeed. College and university students should have the right to use their laptops for note-taking in class because they are responsible for their education; in doing so students professors and schools can gain many benefits. As the cost of living and pursuing an education becomes more expensive investments in one’s future must be made wisely. In an age when technology and information are highly valued many students have invested large amounts of money into purchasing a laptop. The assumption made when purchasing the computer is that they would be able to use its capability and purpose fully. Although banning students from using laptops in class appears to be a minor issue it is not: when professors and schools ban students from typing out their notes in class they handicap the learning process for those who find laptops advantageous. Although there are still many students who do not bring their laptops to class many do own one and use it at home. Clearly laptops and computers have become a staple for students and the educational field as a whole. The solution to ban laptops from being used in class is no solution at all. Simply blaming laptops as the cause for problems that have existed long before laptops became popular is not a mature or effective way to improve education; those who do so are not considering the real problems. Schools that support that ban will effectively have severed a great opportunity for improving education and therefore adversely affect a large part of future generations. As we live in a globalized world our lives are now affected by others living on the opposite ends of the Earth. Other countries either have or are building strong educational foundations for their people. Now is not the time to take steps backward. As a college student dedicated to my education and my future. I believe that those who have control over how I can and cannot pursue my education should examine this issue more fairly and not be so swift to turn a blind eye to the advantages that laptops offer. As with all changes that develop in life the ability to make good changes come out of opportunities is never done by denying people those opportunities. That is a great very detailed summary of allowing laptops in the classroom. I agree with what you’ve said and I believe that professors should always allow laptops into the classroom and that given time the laptop will evolve into the same comfort zone in the classroom that the cell phone has. Do you use any specific software for you note taking in the classroom? I work for a company that is marketing and we are curious to learn more about students that do use in the classroom so we can help to implement what students need and want to improve the note-taking process. Please feel free to contact me if you’d be interested in giving us information on your note-taking experience.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://nshadowsong.wordpress.com/2008/06/09/laptops-an-educational-essential/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

CHICAGO (ELCA) -- Nine students attending colleges and universities of the Evangelical Lutheran perform in America (ELCA) will receive scholarships in the amounts of $10,000. $5,000 or $3,000 for the 2008-09 school year from the ELCA Foundation through the Rossing Fund for Physics Education Endowment. The endowment was set up by Thomas D. Rossing professor emeritus. Northern Illinois University. DeKalb. Ill. who is currently a guest professor of music. Stanford University. Palo Alto. Calif. Rossing established the fund in 2005. The endowment provides scholarships to students studying physics. The selection committee chose three students for $10,000 scholarships -- Dirk Lorenz a senior at Texas Lutheran University. Seguin; Christene Lynch a senior at Gettysburg College. Gettysburg. Pa.; and Daniel Endean a senior at St. Olaf College. Northfield. Minn. Endean received the distinction measure year and his scholarship will be renewed for the upcoming educate year. Four runners-up were chosen to acquire $5,000 scholarships -- Barry Constanzi and Charles McEachern both seniors at St. Olaf; Andrea Schiefelbein a senior at Luther College. Decorah. Iowa; and Katelyn color a senior at California Lutheran University. Thousand Oaks. Schiefelbein received a $3,000 scholarship in 2007 from the endowment. The committee chose two alternates to receive $3,000 scholarships -- Alison Harmelink a junior at Concordia College. Moorhead. Minn. and Tim Uher a junior at Wittenberg University. Springfield. Ohio. The ELCA Foundation assists congregations and individuals in enable planning that supports ministries of the ELCA.-- -- -- More information about the Foundation of the ELCA is at on the Web.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://archive.elca.org/News/Releases.asp?article=3879

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Netbriefings ordain stream live video from the Seton Hall School of Law's upcoming Constitution Day conference over the Web and into a special location for the event in back up Life. The conference's "Interrogation and Intelligence Gathering" schedule will be streamed over the Web on Sept. 17 for participating colleges and universities across the nation. Netbriefings is also working with a furnish. New Jersey-based video production firm MIB Productions to stream the webcast into a virtual Guantanamo Bay detention center in back up Life as a pilot schedule to give an ongoing online platform for the discussion of constitutional political and international issues. "This is a big event to launch our efforts in the virtual world," said Professor Mark Denbeaux who developed the Constitution Day program. "We hope to create a displace for meaningful interaction and discussion around the Guantanamo Bay topic but that's only the beginning. We want to see populate get excited about an intelligent diverse consider about political and legal issues." The virtual detention center was developed with funding from the MacArthur Foundation by Nonny de la Pena producer and director of the documentary "Unconstitutional: The War on Our Civil Liberties," and Peggy Weil professor of interactive media at the University of Southern California. The virtual Guantanamo Bay center in back up Life lets visitors walk through the experience of military detention and watch clips from de la Pena's documentary. "Online video is becoming an essential move of any big event," said Gary Anderson. CEO of Netbriefings. "Whether we're working with a CEO on a study announcement or with an event that's being re-created in Second Life the key is that we take the technical load off our clients' shoulders so all they need to mind about is putting on a successful event."

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.geniusdv.com/weblog/archives/netbriefings_helps_university_stream_live_event.php

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

The New York Times study abroad last August caused quite a stir in the academic community and the fact that the NY attorney command followed up with subpoenas intensified our arouse. If you’re desire me back when the student give people got into a similar jam your reaction was sadness that something desire this could happen in the academic community and perhaps a bit of a temptation to think that it made sense that it would be "the money people" that would get into this sort of trouble. My own take is that in spite of Schemo’s attempts to alter our industry sound like a den of thieves most of the practices described in her article are ethical. There was one line though that caught my attention and I’ll focus some attention on that one practice in this entry. According to Schemo some colleges sign restrictive agreements and receive money from a provider for restricting students to that provider’s programs in a particular region. I was surprised by this one. If it’s true it is clearly a violation of study abroad ethics by both the provider and the academic institutions signing such an agreement. Like pornography unethical marketing practices are hard to be but we experience them when we see them. Having spent a good number of years in chew over abroad both at a major university and at a provider. I have a clear comprehend of the obligations that bind academic institutions and their subcontractors when it comes to student choices. Let’s be clear though—academic institutions certainly undergo every right to make rules about what students can get ascribe for—education is not just a commodity; for education to be effective the educators must impose their own judgment in some instances rather than allowing the "customers" complete freedom of choice. But with that right to make rules—in this instance the right to circumscribe students to certain study abroad programs—comes an attendant obligation. Academic institutions have the absolute obligation to make those decisions—allowing some programs and ruling out others—on the basis of academic considerations. Academic quality and integrity adherence to a philosophy of study abroad that is consistent with the institution’s perspectives a good or bad fit with academic programs offered at the institution—all of these are legitimate reasons for an institution to approve some chew over experiences and refuse to give ascribe for others. But let’s be clear restricting student access in transfer for a kickback is unethical. No provider should ever ask an academic institution to do this and no college or university should ever accept such an arrangement. Probably things work out best when the study abroad office itself does not undergo the right to grant or withhold approved status from specific programs. Many institutions undergo committees to do this—faculty and administrators with no vested interest in the financial aspects of study abroad. This is a good way to avoid falling into the "kickback" trap. You've raised a very important rule in governance of chew over abroad ethics. However a broader issue of "access" and choice could be addressed. For example schools making exclusive contracts with beverage vendors book hold on tie-ins insurance provider requirements etc all can be folded into the larger discussion. Where will all of this end? I sincerely believe that we as professionals do direct to higher standard and that maybe a "label of ethics" formalized and displayed on our campus websites could and should be in order. However let us not throw the baby out with the bath. On our campuses we have been asked to compete the role of agents of due dilligence of evaluating programs every year and five years to insure academic integrity student service needs etc. The rub is that as members of large state supported institutions we lack the finances and staffing to monitor programs that without support give we are unable to comply with. In defence of program providers that we bring home the bacon with none has demanded either in writing or with a "gesticulate" that our institution send students to the program provider exclusively. We take the approach that students make decisions based on a set of criteria. We are there to support them in their decision and to provide them with guidance should they ask. Perhaps this is a bit of a laissez faire mentality but it seems to bring home the bacon very well for us and the student.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://studyabroad.typepad.com/from_the_desk_of_bill_cre/2007/09/study-abroad-et.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

The Financial Aid broadcast daily free MP3 financial aid Internet communicate no iPod needed. FAP627: Planning for the 2008. Fraternities. Becca Loebe be Student Financial Aid News+ : To cut costs the Department of Education ordain stop shipping the in bulk paper orders.+ that college students now have greater interest in buying an after the $200 determine drop+ : an unusual decision from a federal appeals act on Thursday is challenging conventional wisdom. The decision upheld the right of a public college — the College of Staten Island of the City University of New York — to contradict recognition to a fraternity because it doesn’t let women become members. In ruling as it did the U. S. act of Appeals for the Second Circuit open that the college’s anti-bias rules served an important state answer — and a function that was more important than the limits faced by a fraternity not being recognized. Update+ Americanism Educational unify established in 1927 is a youth-oriented public function foundation providing a range of patriotic-educational services through schools and colleges nationwide. The 1,500 maximum evince essay must be typed and manifold spaced. Each essay must be accompanied by an Entry create and a apprise biography. Each college instructor may refer an unlimited be of essays.+ The contest is open to all registered under-graduate college and university students in the United States. First prize is $5,000 second is $2,500 third is $1,500 foruth is $1,000 and two awards of $500 each.+ Deadline April 2+ Focus on Financial Aid+ With today’s news now is the time to start thinking about your.+ Consult a professional financial planner to structure your 2007 taxes+ Adjusted gross income counts most of all so bear on focus to that+ Grab a write of last year’s to review what ordain be asked of you+ Ask questions now - figure out what’s most confusing+ If you or someone you experience is from a low-income family without good broadband internet access contact us prior to January 1 about booking an appointment @ SLN+ We’ll see about putting up a video on of the entire affect+ Sign up for in your area Podsafe Music+ + be at the Lizard sit Reminders+ + + + + + + .+ The is a publication of the. I want to comprehend from you! telecommunicate me at financialaidpodcast {at} gmail {dot} com visit http://www. FinancialAidPodcast com or call 206-350-1208. The is a publication of the. All material is copyright © 1998 - 2007 iPod and iTunes are registered trademarks of Apple Computer. Inc. Contents may not be reproduced or redistributed for commercial purposes. Educational institutions are welcome to apply material with beat attribution under the. I keep back the alter to update alter edit or delete comments submitted for any reason. |

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.financialaidpodcast.com/2007/09/17/fap627-planning-for-the-2008-fafsa-fraternities-becca-loebe-live/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Many people have heard about. However a large portion of potential students at colleges or universities traditional as come up as online are not familiar with the concept “accreditation” in relation to institutions of higher education. State licensure allows a university college or educate to operate legally however the standards a school must meet to achieve it are not so very high. When it comes to accreditation the criteria is far higher. This means that if you find a a school offering that claims to have the and emphasize licensure but hardly mention accreditation; be on the altert. It is even more momentous to understand that many colleges and universities especially online schools claim accreditation from agencies which have not received accreditation from the United States Department of Education. While some of these unrecognized accrediting agencies may do an attempt to evaluate and change surface insist on some quality decide from the institutions they accredit their approval is normally worthless in the world of profession as well as in the world of fully accredited education institutions. For instance no decent educate or college will hire a teacher or administrator without a degree from a legitimately accredited educate. Most higher education institutions ordain not award students assign credit for coursework completed at institutions not accredited by a recognized accrediting agency. The reality is that most colleges universities businesses government agencies as well as prospective employers of all kinds will believe a college or university as unaccredited if it is not accredited by an accrediting agency recognized by the United States Department of Education. Even if your educational and career goals are such that accreditation is not a big broach for you now attending a college or university that is not fully accredited could turn out to be a huge mistake for several reasons. Accredited schools are much more likely to furnish you a high quality academic program staffed by qualified faculty. And if your situation or your goals change a degree from an accredited institution will give you far more options. The best you can do is to tour the U. S. Department of Education website get a complete list of recognized accrediting agencies and decide only a college university or educate accredited by one or more of them. No educate whether traditional or online can promise you the moon just because it has been accredited. What accreditation does however is to virtually pledge that you’ll get top qualified instructors and high quality up to date curriculum with all the benefits this generates. In addition most employers will look at a be to Credible Reviews for reliable info from real populate. New reviews are added daily. Use the add above to bid to our feed and undergo the latest news delivered to your home summon.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.crediblereviews.com/education/279/the-purpose-of-accreditation

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

The article is written by Anthony Kronman. Sterling Professor of Law at Yale. He is offering the notion that college students are being deprived of an open dialogue about the deep questions of life because faculty members have “ceased to think of themselves as shapers of souls”. What starts off promising ends with a surprising non-surprise. He asserts that the answers to these spiritual questions can be sought indeed must be sought outside of any assumption of God. This is an interesting article that I encourage you to read. There is much to be learned here both from what is said and what is not said. Professor Kronman observes that students are hungering for spiritual (my word) things and the university has an obligation to facilitate the means that are necessary to satisfy that ache…as long as religion and God aren’t move of those means. Here is a quote: I find it interesting (yet typical) that educated men and women desire Dr. Kronman are wont to communicate of spiritualily and mankind’s “soul” yet deny a “soul-giver”. If there is no God then human beings (and everything else) are the product of mindless chance - a random collection of atoms and nothing more a quirky anomaly in a vast indifferent universe headed toward eventual oblivion. There would be no “soul” to communicate about no spirituality to contend with and any such discussion would be meaningless. That people of intellect fail to see this obvious paradox in their thinking is both amusing and disconcerting. While I do not claim to be as intellectually developed as Professor Kronman. I have studied these issues enough to alter an educated observation. In simple terms it seems alter to me that the reason the academic world sought to abandon their seek for the meaning of life is because without a solid spiritual foundation it just leads to circular thinking that revolves around a seemingly unsolvable problem. If everyone is free to cause their own meaning to life…then the only way to realize that meaning is to get majorities of people on the same instruct of thought. Which brings us back to this notion (Carl Rogers and Albert Ellis) that if we can “fix” the culture (get everyone into cooperative harmonious modes of operation) it would cure the social ills of our world (because we have no inherent social ills when we are born). There is a reason that many philosophers in history literally lost their minds. Those who attempted to figure out the meaning of life without God were unable to do so. If you take a powerful intellectual engine and crank it up to full speed…it burns itself up when you put it on an endless road with no finish line or destination. It literally spins itself alter off its mounting bolts and crumples in a heated meltdown. The cerebrate academia abandoned its role as a shaper of souls is because shaping souls has no meaning beyond God. What is the purpose? The academic leaders of the past were not blind… just resigned to the fact that the valiant efforts of the non-religious philosophers before them had already settled some important issues. And that was that the humanities could explore some meaning and intend for limited windows of measure and lay on this planet. Beyond that venue the shaping of souls had little meaning (that was worth the measure and effort of exploration)…desire a mineral cave that was mined out… nothing much left to remove that had any determine. This is exactly why the Truth Project is so important for our grow and our world. Without such efforts any trend of academia to search for the meaning of life (without God) will just lead to more insanity hopelessness and despair. We must not abandon this cosmic contend for the minds of mankind. I would like to propose one piece of required reading for Dr. Kronman’s students (as well as all thoughtful Christians). His basic project of seeking the meaning of life without invoking God has been undertaken before–nearly 3,000 years ago in fact–and its definitive results are documented in the greatest work of pure philosophy ever written. We know it as the Old Testament book of Ecclesiastes. I just started leading an adult Bible class on it and showed excerpts from move 2 of The Truth communicate as an introduction. Solomon uses the term “under the sun” for what Dr. Tackett calls “inside the box” and states repeatedly (and convincingly) that everything in that category is “meaningless a chasing after the go” (1:14). Without divinely revealed universals any act to find meaning in the particulars of life is inherently futile–”vanity of vanities” as the literal translations say or “empty” which is the essence of the original Hebrew evince. Natural science (1:4-9. 3:18-21) worldly wisdom (1:13-18. 7:23-25. 9:13-10:1) pleasure (2:1-11) do work (2:17-23. 4:4-6) wealth (5:10-17) justice (5:8-9. 8:9-11. 8:14).

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://deltackett.com/2007/09/17/searching-for-ponies-in-a-pile-of-hay/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

The Southern Education Foundation has released a report indicating that 35,000 college students from Louisiana and Mississippi have not returned to campus since Hurricanes Katrina and Rita nor have they enrolled in other schools. “Education After Katrina: Time for a New Federal Response” reports that almost one out of six Louisiana college students dropped out of school for the 2005-2006 academic year. Because of this two dozen colleges and universities were temporarily closed. “Not since the Great Depression of the 1930s has the United States witnessed so many of its own students thrown out of educate,” the report open. “During the measure two years however the most powerful national government in the world has spent relatively small amounts of measure money and effort in helping to set the hurricane-displaced students and the schools they attend.” According to the report the U. S government has given Louisiana the same amount of aid–$131 million–as the express received from foreign countries which include Kuwait. Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. During the year Katrina struck no funds had been provided by the U. S government to place the more than 60,000 displaced college students. The foundation and the report calls for the government to step up and help the ailing colleges and universities affected by the hurricanes stating it is not too late for it to make a difference. <a href="" call=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <label> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://blog.edudirectories.com/2007/09/05/hurricanes-still-affecting-enrollment-in-louisiana-and-mississippi/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

As the be of U. S branch campuses continues to change – increasing from 24 in 2002 to 82 measure year according to a inform from the London-based Observatory on Borderless Higher Education – concerns about questionable business practices at these potentially lucrative overseas outposts change as come up. “If one starts looking under the rocks of this whole international business one ordain find lots of sleazy things under there,” said Philip G. Altbach a professor and director of the Center for International Education at Boston College. “A lot of this cram exists because it is overseas and it’s a non-regulated environment and therefore both institutions in this country and also the other sponsoring countries the Brits and the Australians and so on and so forth can do things that are not watched very carefully and that might not be acceptable at domiciliate – but are somehow acceptable overseas,” Altbach said. A Monday Baltimore Sun article highlighted what the reporter called “a inspect study of the lightly regulated turn’s promises and potential risks.” The bind which was hotly contested by university officials described a contractual relationship that the University of Maryland University College has entered into with ST International for the recruitment and administration of its doctor of management schedule in Taiwan. A spokesman for the university confirmed Monday that the company. STI receives 25 percent of each student’s tuition dollars — an arrangement that wouldn’t seem to pass muster if the schedule were based in the United States where federal law bars colleges from paying recruiters based on how many students they enroll. To minimize the university’s financial risk the 69 Taiwanese students also are required to sign an upfront assure committing to the be of the three-year program (valued according to the schedule’s executive director. Bryan Booth at $45,600) — unlike their peers enrolled in the schedule domestically. The part-time doctor of management schedule has 189 students enrolled stateside and is designed to furnish practical business training with dissertations based in literature and theory but still tightly tied to actual industry needs said Claudine SchWeber a full professor in the domestic schedule. Recent dissertation topics consider “A CIO Decision-Making Framework for Technology Investments in Higher Education” and “Improving the Quality of Information Technology (IT) Security Audits for Federal Agencies.” UMUC’s president. Susan C. Aldridge stressed that ST International which initially approached the university about the possibility of offering its management program on a pilot basis in Taiwan is compensated not just for student recruitment but also for the give services infrastructure and logistical assistance that it offers. Essentially the contractor provides the infrastructure and the logistical support — including pre-screening applicants for the university which makes the admissions decisions — while UMUC provides the academic content and the faculty. “It’s a mistake to say that this dollar amount is strictly for recruitment — it’s not,” Aldridge said. “The amount that’s paid covers classroom space covers computer labs covers all the equipment lunches and meals for students logistical and on-the-ground transportation for the faculty when they’re there making hotel arrangements for the faculty office space for the faculty and Internet while they’re there as well as recruitment,” Aldridge said. However critics have raised questions about whether the same arrangement if implemented in the United States would violate federal law by tying the compensation of a company that engages in recruitment (among other services) to the volume of students in the program — and query why such an arrangement should be tolerated overseas regardless of the inapplicability of federal laws there. “If an institution is engaging in practices [overseas] that would either be illegal or outright unthinkable or unacceptable here it’s a problem,” said Barmak Nassirian associate executive director at the American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers. “You can’t undergo that kind of straightforward commission deal here in the U. S for call IV participating institutions,” Nassirian said a reference to accredited colleges where students are eligible for federal financial aid funds. “You have to believe that revenue has something to do with this. Why else would an institution engage in these kinds of practices? It’s certainly not academically justifiable,” said Nassirian. “My sense very vaguely from afar without naming names is that certain regions of the world are perceived as offering good business opportunities and the temptation therefore is to simply plant a sign there and occupy a space that you might be concerned might go to someone else.” “It’s in our mission as a university to answer students around the world,” said Aldridge. UMUC’s president. About 50 percent of the university’s students are located overseas thanks in move to the institution’s historic role in maintaining contracts with the U. S military. Domestically about 85 percent of students are hold education learners. “We take the responsibility very seriously. We act the integrity of our academic programs very seriously.” But at the same measure. Aldridge added referring to the risks of operating a program abroad without a knowledgeable third-party vendor. “We must verify in these environments that we are fiscally prudent and that we safeguard the university. That does convey that we may have to put in some restrictions and constraints that we don’t undergo here because they are so far away.” “The [Baltimore Sun] article tried to make some point. ‘come up the federal government doesn’t allow this in the United States.’ That’s a completely different be because the law is very explicit that this is to prevent inappropriate recruiting of students who are eligible for federal financial aid,” said William E. Kirwan chancellor of the University of Maryland system of which UMUC is a move. “The federal regulations are for a very appropriate purpose which don’t be to me to apply in the case to overseas students all of whom have master’s degrees and they’re certainly not eligible for federal financial aid.” While federal laws of course don’t apply overseas and experts decry a lack of oversight of grow campuses and programs operating through the auspices of U. S.-based institutions abroad they are subject to some degree of scrutiny through the accreditation process. Judith S. Eaton president of the Council for Higher Education Accreditation said that federal regulations stipulate that the addition of a grow campus constitutes a “substantive change” (in accreditation-speak) for an institution and therefore any new locations would be affect to analyse. However the regulations also provide some flexibility — so colleges with established track records abroad may not be affect to the same scrutiny. Accrediting agencies don’t play the gate-keeping role when it comes to federal financial aid funding for campuses or programs overseas but a home university’s accreditation status could theoretically be jeopardized by substandard operations abroad. Eaton said. “The commission in the past has said when something isn’t meeting the commission’s.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://mongkol.wordpress.com/2007/09/18/the-business-of-branching-out/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam